data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
FE1
compare
In FE, the missing slur in the L.H. is a patent inaccuracy (in addition, the staccato marks in the 2nd half of the bar were overlooked, not to mention the Terzverschreibung error – see the subsequent notes in this bar). The slur was added in GE and EE.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions
issues: EE revisions, GE revisions
notation: Slurs