EE1
compare
b. 359
The version of GE is most probably a Terzverschreibung error – cf. similar bar 367. A mistake can be provoked by both f notes at the end of the previous triplets and the missing before that note in FE (the missing accidental was added in EE).
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: EE revisions, Errors in GE, Terzverschreibung error
notation: Pitch