EE1
compare
It is difficult to determine the reason the accent in GE was omitted – possible options are an oversight or a revision of GE (by analogy to bar 147?), or possibly the fact that the mark was added only just in the last phase of proofreading of FE. Not only did GE3 not complete that deficiency, but it also overlooked the mark in bar 146, which can also be interpreted as a mistake or revision.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Errors in GE
notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins