data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
In the main text, we suggest prolonging the e1 quaver in bar 66 to the next bar, like Chopin marked it – probably during the last phase of proofreading – in analogous bars 294-295. Taking into account the fact that this insignificant detail of accompaniment appears two times in total a few minutes apart, we consider inadvertence to be a more likely reason for discrepancies in the notation of analogous bars than an intention to differentiate between those places.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Editorial revisions
issues: Omitted correction of an analogous place
notation: Rhythm