Issues : Sign reversal
|
b. 29
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
Minor gaps between the notes in FE hamper the evaluation of the size and placement of the mark, looking like a reversed accent. In this melodic and harmonic context, the mark in [A] could indicate a reversed accent (short or long) or a category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Sign reversal |
|||||
|
b. 41
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The slur of FE (→GE1→GE2) is most probably a mistake, hence in the main text we include a correction introduced in EE and GE3. We may be dealing here with a peculiar mark reversal – the engraver led the slur from the 1st semiquaver of the triplet to the left instead of to the right (cf. a similar mistake in the Concerto in F minor, op. 21, the 3rd mov., bars 172-173). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Sign reversal |
|||||
|
b. 47
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The change of direction of the dynamic hairpin is almost certainly a mistake of the engraver of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Sign reversal |
hairpin, encompassing the first or the second beat of the bar or both. According to us, it is the use of a reversed long accent that seems to be most likely.
in 