Issues : Errors in GE
b. 94
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
In the main text, we give the unequivocal rhythm of FE (→EE). In GE1 (→GE2), the whole group of 6 notes was combined by mistake with a demisemiquaver beam, which was revised in GE3 by adding the digit 6 and moving the last quaver in the L.H. under f2. It resulted in a totally arbitrary and still erroneous version, since the sextuplet should be written with semiquavers in this place. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors |
|||||
b. 96
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
Naturally, the version of GE1 is erroneous – cf. all variants of this phrase in bars 47, 49 and 98, where the respective note is never lowered. A sharp was most probably added as part of a routine revision of accidentals – the reviser probably did not recognise the unusual G major key and having considered the f2 note in the 1st half of the bar to be a typical alteration of g2, he "corrected" the alleged oversight of its cancellation. The mistake was corrected in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 96
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
One can ponder what type of accents Chopin meant in this bar – the markings are slightly longer than the undoubtedly short accent in bar 99, but clearly shorter than those in bar 94 (over e4) and 95 (over e). Due to this reason, we assume that they are short accents. The absence of the second marking in GE may be an oversight. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in GE |
|||||
b. 99
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The missing 3rd fingering digit in this bar is probably an oversight of the engraver of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||
b. 99
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |