Issues : Annotations in FEH
|
b. 91
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
In FE, there are no accidentals before the 4th semiquaver in the R.H. and the bottom note of the 3rd quaver in the L.H. Oversights of the symbols of the current key, typical of Chopin, were corrected both in GE and EE. A sharp in the L.H. was added also in FEH and FES. In the latter, cautionary double sharps before f category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Annotations in FES , Last key signature sign , Annotations in FEH |
|||||||||||
|
b. 94
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||
|
b. 96
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The fingering in FEH implements one of the most characteristic Chopinesque pianistic ploys – sliding the finger from a black to white key (cf. e.g. the Sonata in B category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||
|
b. 98
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
In the main text, we include the fingering of FEH, written probably by Chopin and confirmed by the undoubtedly Chopinesque entry in FES. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FES , Annotations in FEH |
|||||||||||
|
b. 98
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
In the main text, we give the more accurately marked fingering of FEH. Its authenticity is confirmed by the digits written in FES, indicating almost certainly the same fingering. The fingering added by Fontana in EE is also compliant with the entries from the pupils' copies in this case. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FES , Annotations in FEH |
2 on the 2nd and 4th beats of the bar were also added.
minor, op. 35, the 3rd mov., 
