|
b. 47
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The tenuto dashes added in FED emphasise the split of the melody into 2 voices – cf. the notation of analogous bar 96. Chopin would use this mark only occasionally, e.g. in the Concerto in F minor, op. 21, the 2nd mov., bar 18. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 47
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
In the main text, we add a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||
|
b. 48
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The lack of accent in GE3 is undoubtedly a mistake. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 49
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
Chopin's poorly legible entry in FES most probably indicates the use of the 4th finger on d category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FES |
||||||||
|
b. 49
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The missing slur probably stems from inattention of the engraver of GE1, although it cannot be excluded that Chopin added this slur only in the last proofreading of FE (→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
before e3. The mark was added both in 
2. The digits added by Fontana in 
