mUltimate Chopin

Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Page: 
Source: 
p. 26, b. 573-599
p. 1, b. 1-44
p. 2, b. 45-92
p. 3, b. 93-136
p. 4, b. 137-159
p. 5, b. 160-178
p. 6, b. 179-194
p. 7, b. 195-210
p. 8, b. 211-231
p. 9, b. 232-256
p. 10, b. 257-280
p. 11, b. 281-295
p. 12, b. 296-310
p. 13, b. 311-325
p. 14, b. 326-355
p. 15, b. 356-393
p. 16, b. 394-410
p. 17, b. 411-425
p. 18, b. 426-440
p. 19, b. 441-455
p. 20, b. 456-470
p. 21, b. 471-486
p. 22, b. 487-521
p. 23, b. 522-539
p. 24, b. 540-555
p. 25, b. 556-572
p. 26, b. 573-599
p. 27, b. 600-620
p. 28, b. 621-640
p. 29, b. 641-660
p. 30, b. 661-689
Main text
Main text
Atut - Autograph of first Tutti
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - Dubois copy
FEFo - Forest copy
FEH - Hartmann copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected impression of GE1
GE2a - Altered impression of GE2
GE3 - Second German edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE2
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
Atut - Autograph of first Tutti
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - Dubois copy
FEFo - Forest copy
FEH - Hartmann copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected impression of GE1
GE2a - Altered impression of GE2
GE3 - Second German edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE2
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text

  b. 585

R.H. accent in FE (→EE,GE1→GE2)

No mark in GE3

L.H. long accent suggested by the editors

In the sources, placing an accent under the tied note of the R.H., which deprives the mark of its actual meaning, suggests an inaccuracy in reproducing the Stichvorlage. In the main text, we repeat the notation of the analogous bar of exposition (bar 235) – a long accent over the L.H. part. 

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in FE, GE revisions

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

Missing markers on sources: GE1, GE2, FE1, FED, FEH, FEJ, FES, GE3, EE1, EE2, EE3, Atut, GE2a, FEFo
Complete ➔