Page:
Source:
p. 7, b. 195-210
Main text
Prezentacja
Select
b. 205
The fact of leaving the first two semiquavers of the passage outside of the slur is almost certainly an inaccuracy of notation – cf. analogous bar 209. The missing slur in GE3 is probably a revision – this edition omitted all slurs in the R.H. in bars 203-210.
See b. 203
Compare the passage in the sources»
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Inaccuracies in FE, GE revisions
notation: Slurs
Missing markers on sources:
GE1, GE2, FE1, FED, FEH, FEJ, FES, GE3, EE1, EE2, EE3, Atut, GE2a, FEFo