FE1
compare
b. 205
The fact of leaving the first two semiquavers of the passage outside of the slur is almost certainly an inaccuracy of notation – cf. analogous bar 209. The missing slur in GE3 is probably a revision – this edition omitted all slurs in the R.H. in bars 203-210.
Compare the passage in the sources »
See b. 203
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Inaccuracies in FE, GE revisions
notation: Slurs