mUltimate Chopin

Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Page: 
Source: 
p. 5, b. 160-178
p. 1, b. 1-44
p. 2, b. 45-92
p. 3, b. 93-136
p. 4, b. 137-159
p. 5, b. 160-178
p. 6, b. 179-194
p. 7, b. 195-210
p. 8, b. 211-231
p. 9, b. 232-256
p. 10, b. 257-280
p. 11, b. 281-295
p. 12, b. 296-310
p. 13, b. 311-325
p. 14, b. 326-355
p. 15, b. 356-393
p. 16, b. 394-410
p. 17, b. 411-425
p. 18, b. 426-440
p. 19, b. 441-455
p. 20, b. 456-470
p. 21, b. 471-486
p. 22, b. 487-521
p. 23, b. 522-539
p. 24, b. 540-555
p. 25, b. 556-572
p. 26, b. 573-599
p. 27, b. 600-620
p. 28, b. 621-640
p. 29, b. 641-660
p. 30, b. 661-689
Main text
Main text
Atut - Autograph of first Tutti
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - Dubois copy
FEFo - Forest copy
FEH - Hartmann copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected impression of GE1
GE2a - Altered impression of GE2
GE3 - Second German edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE2
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
Atut - Autograph of first Tutti
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - Dubois copy
FEFo - Forest copy
FEH - Hartmann copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected impression of GE1
GE2a - Altered impression of GE2
GE3 - Second German edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE2
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text

  b. 177

Short accent in FE

No mark in GE

Long accent in EE

The missing accent in GE must be an oversight. The long accent in EE1 seems to be an inaccuracy, which EE2 (→EE3) tried to correct by shifting the mark slightly to the left. In such a context, it is highly likely that it is a long accent that corresponds to the notation of [A].

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Long accents, EE revisions, Errors in GE

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

Missing markers on sources: GE1, GE2, FE1, FED, FEH, FEJ, FES, GE3, EE1, EE2, EE3, Atut, GE2a, FEFo
Complete ➔