Page: 
Source: 
p. 4, b. 29-54
p. 1
p. 2
p. 3, b. 1-28
p. 4, b. 29-54
p. 5, b. 55-85
p. 6, b. 86-111
p. 7, b. 112-138
p. 8
Atut - Autograph of first Tutti
Main text
Atut - Autograph of first Tutti
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - Dubois copy
FEFo - Forest copy
FEH - Hartmann copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected impression of GE1
GE2a - Altered impression of GE2
GE3 - Second German edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE2
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
Atut - Autograph of first Tutti
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - Dubois copy
FEFo - Forest copy
FEH - Hartmann copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected impression of GE1
GE2a - Altered impression of GE2
GE3 - Second German edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE2
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Atut - Autograph of first Tutti


  b. 49

Staccato dots in Atut

R.H. dot in FE (→EE)

No marks in GE

The missing staccato dot for the octave in the L.H. must be an oversight of the engraver of FE (→EE). In GE, the dot in the R.H. was also overlooked.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE, Errors in GE

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

Missing markers on sources: GE1, GE2, FE1, FED, FEH, FEJ, FES, GE3, EE1, EE2, EE3, Atut, GE2a, FEFo