Issues : Errors in EE
b. 88-89
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Errors in GE |
||||||
b. 150-152
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
According to us, the likelihood of the authenticity of Fontana's fingering in EE is minimal. In EE1, it clearly contains a mistake – the 3-5 sequence under the 4th and 5th semiquavers is very inconvenient. The mistake was corrected in EE2 (→EE3), changing the digit under g2 to a '4'. However, it seems to be more likely that Fontana projected the fingers 3-4 for these notes in order to avoid the 5th finger on the black key – the use of the regular scheme 512451... would not have required such a detailed marking; it would have been enough to repeat 51 at the beginning of the subsequent groups of semiquavers, like in bars 142-143. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
||||||
b. 153-154
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing staccato dots in EE and GE may be attributed to either a common oversight of the engraver or an omission due to misunderstanding of this subtle articulation detail – cf. a similar situation in the Concerto in F minor, op. 21, the 1st mov., bar 90. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Errors in GE |
||||||
b. 170
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing stem extending a must be a mistake of EE1 (→EE2), corrected in EE3 most probably on the basis of comparison with analogous bar 525. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
||||||
b. 181
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The fact that b is to be held is marked in FE (→GE) through an additional stem and extending dot for the 4th semiquaver. In further bars, Chopin already applies the notation with tie; therefore, in the main text, we adopt this more exact notation also in this case (similarily in bar 537). In EE1 (→EE2), the note was not held, which was corrected in EE3, most probably on the basis of comparison with the respective bar of the recapitulation. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |