Issues : Authentic corrections of FE
|
b. 354
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, one can see traces of removal of wedges over the 1st and 2nd crotchets in this bar. The engraver most probably mistook this bar for the next one. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
|
b. 356-359
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The rhythm of GE – quavers on the 3rd beat of each of these bars – is probably the original version, corrected by Chopin in FE (→EE). In the orchestral part, a corresponding correction must have been introduced still in the manuscripts, since in the parts of flutes, clarinet and bassoon, there are no indications of corrections of rhythm. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
|
b. 385
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing c1-e1 third, ending the phrase of the orchestral part, is most probably a mistake of the engraver of GE. It could also indicate that it was added in the last proofreading of FE, yet the engraver's mistake is supported by the placement of the Solo indication in GE, i.e. only just over the 2nd beat of the bar, probably due to this third, which does not belong to the solo part. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
|
b. 410
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Traces of corrections in print, visible in FE, suggest that it was initially g category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
|
b. 412-413
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing wedges in the R.H. at the beginning of these bars in GE1 (→GE2) are most probably an oversight of the engraver, although one cannot exclude that they could have been added in the last proofreading of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
that was printed as the 1st semiquaver. It could have been a mistake or the original version of the beginning of the passage.
