Issues : Omission of current key accidentals
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 420
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors repeated in EE |
|
b. 424
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE (→EE), there is no accidental before the 2nd semiquaver. A sharp necessary to achieve c1, undoubtedly intended by Chopin in this case, was added in GE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors repeated in EE |
|
b. 437
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, there is no raising d2 to d2 before the 1st semiquaver. This patent inaccuracy was corrected in GE and EE. category imprint: Interpretations within context issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals |
|
b. 441
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, there is no raising c2 to c2. Visible traces of corrections in print reveal that it was a1 that was the original version; it was moved to the correct pitch in the proofreading, yet without . This patent oversight (of the engraver or of Chopin at the time of marking the correction) was revised both in GE and EE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: EE revisions , Errors resulting from corrections , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE |
|
b. 552
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »