mUltimate Chopin

Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : Errors in GE

b. 420

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

 in FE (→EE)

No sign in GE
..

The missing ​​​​​​​ hairpin is most probably an oversight of the engraver of GE1, unless the mark was added in the last proofreading of FE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 424

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

In GE3, the  raising d1 to d​​​​​​​1 was overlooked (removed by mistake?).

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 427

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

The 1st note in GE1 (→GE2) is an erroneous b​​​​​​​3 due to the misplaced octave sign.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 429

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

GE1 (→GE2) overlooked the rest after the 1st quaver. The mistake was corrected in GE3.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 430-431

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Slur in bar 430 in FE (→EE) & GE3

No slur in GE1 (→GE2)

Slur to bar 431 suggested by the editors
..

In the main text, we extend the slur until the last note of the passage by analogy with bars 426-427. The absence of the slur in GE1 (→GE2) must be a mistake of the engraver; it was added in GE3. 

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions