![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors in FE
b. 410
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE (→GE1→GE2), the last semiquaver is already embraced with the octave sign, used for the notation of the 1st beat of the next bar. The mistake was corrected in GE3 and formally also in EE, in which the entire octave sign was removed (overlooked?). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Errors repeated in GE |
|||||
b. 414
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, the 1st quaver in the R.H. is written an octave lower, which resulted from the erroneously ended octave sign (it ends too early) used to write the entire phrase in bars 413-414. This patent mistake was corrected both in GE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 416
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In bar 416, opening a new line, FE overlooked the ending of the slur and, most probably, a wedge in the L.H. part. In EE, both marks were added, whereas in GE1 (GE2), only the wedge (the slur was corrected in GE3, in which there is a different division into lines and pages). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 416-423
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, there are no sharps before the second semiquaver, placed an octave lower than the first one, of the majority of the figures in the L.H. – marks are necessary in 10 out of 15 figures, whereas an appropriate category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 420
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors repeated in EE |