The missing accent in GE must be an oversight. The long accent in EE1 seems to be an inaccuracy, which EE2 (→EE3) tried to correct by shifting the mark slightly to the left. In such a context, it is highly likely that it is a long accent that corresponds to the notation of [A].
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Long accents, EE revisions, Errors in GE
notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
