data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
In the part of the L.H. in Atut, a is present only next to d
in the 1st octave. In FE, a
was added next to the bottom note of this octave, while in the remaining editions, it was added also next to d
1.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources
issues: EE revisions, Accidentals in different octaves, GE revisions, Authentic corrections of FE, Inaccuracies in A
notation: Pitch