mUltimate Chopin

Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Page: 
Source: 
p. 4, b. 52-75
p. 1, b. 1-22
p. 2, b. 23-36
p. 3, b. 37-51
p. 4, b. 52-75
p. 5, b. 76-94
p. 6, b. 95-111
p. 7, b. 112-133
p. 8, b. 134-158
p. 9, b. 159-181
p. 10, b. 182-209
p. 11, b. 210-230
p. 12, b. 231-247
p. 13, b. 248-263
p. 14, b. 264-285
p. 15, b. 286-309
p. 16, b. 310-333
p. 17, b. 334-359
p. 18, b. 360-379
p. 19, b. 380-399
p. 20, b. 400-419
p. 21, b. 420-443
p. 22, b. 444-468
Main text
Main text
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected impression of GE1
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE2
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected impression of GE1
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE2
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text

  b. 55

In the sources, the octave sign does not encompass the grace note, as a result of which, when interpreted literally, it is a b1 and not a b2. The notation of analogous bar 64 proves a mistake in the placement of the octave sign.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Interpretations within context

issues: Errors in FE, Errors repeated in GE, Errors repeated in EE

notation: Pitch

Missing markers on sources: FE1, FEJ, GE1, GE2, EE1, EE2, EE3
Complete ➔