Page: 
Source: 
p. 6, b. 95-111
p. 1, b. 1-22
p. 2, b. 23-36
p. 3, b. 37-51
p. 4, b. 52-75
p. 5, b. 76-94
p. 6, b. 95-111
p. 7, b. 112-133
p. 8, b. 134-158
p. 9, b. 159-181
p. 10, b. 182-209
p. 11, b. 210-230
p. 12, b. 231-247
p. 13, b. 248-263
p. 14, b. 264-285
p. 15, b. 286-309
p. 16, b. 310-333
p. 17, b. 334-359
p. 18, b. 360-379
p. 19, b. 380-399
p. 20, b. 400-419
p. 21, b. 420-443
p. 22, b. 444-468
Main text
Main text
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected impression of GE1
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE2
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected impression of GE1
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE2
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 108

All sources are missing the ending of the slur in the R.H. on a new line, in spite of the fact that a correspondingly prolonged slur in the previous bar suggests its continuation. We lead it to the first note in bar 108, to the end of the phrase, like it is in the adjacent bars.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccuracies in GE, Inaccuracies in FE, EE inaccuracies

notation: Slurs

Missing markers on sources: FE1, FEJ, GE1, GE2, EE1, EE2, EE3