



Page:
Source:
p. 9, b. 159-181
Main text
Prezentacja
Select
copy link
Main text

Leading the L.H. slur until the beginning of bar 164 is much less justified than in the case of the R.H. slur due to the over two-octave f1-E leap. Therefore, it is quite likely that it is the slur added in EE3 that corresponds to Chopin's intention – the engraver of FE could have been under the influence of the R.H. slur while interpreting the slur of [A], perhaps written with a flourish.
Compare the passage in the sources»
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: EE revisions, Errors in EE
notation: Slurs
Missing markers on sources:
FE1, FEJ, GE1, GE2, EE1, EE2, EE3