Page: 
Source: 
p. 18, b. 360-379
p. 1, b. 1-22
p. 2, b. 23-36
p. 3, b. 37-51
p. 4, b. 52-75
p. 5, b. 76-94
p. 6, b. 95-111
p. 7, b. 112-133
p. 8, b. 134-158
p. 9, b. 159-181
p. 10, b. 182-209
p. 11, b. 210-230
p. 12, b. 231-247
p. 13, b. 248-263
p. 14, b. 264-285
p. 15, b. 286-309
p. 16, b. 310-333
p. 17, b. 334-359
p. 18, b. 360-379
p. 19, b. 380-399
p. 20, b. 400-419
p. 21, b. 420-443
p. 22, b. 444-468
Main text
Main text
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected impression of GE1
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE2
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected impression of GE1
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE2
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 370

In FE, the slur ends on the last note of bar 370, despite its continuation on the new line. It must be a mistake of the engraver. In EE and GE, the ending of the slur was extended – a revision we deem accurate – cf. analogous bars 230-231.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions, Inaccuracies in FE, GE revisions

notation: Slurs

Missing markers on sources: FE1, FEJ, GE1, GE2, EE1, EE2, EE3