mUltimate Chopin

Page:

Source:

p. 6, b. 95-111

p. 1, b. 1-22

p. 2, b. 23-36

p. 3, b. 37-51

p. 4, b. 52-75

p. 5, b. 76-94

p. 6, b. 95-111

p. 7, b. 112-133

p. 8, b. 134-158

p. 9, b. 159-181

p. 10, b. 182-209

p. 11, b. 210-230

p. 12, b. 231-247

p. 13, b. 248-263

p. 14, b. 264-285

p. 15, b. 286-309

p. 16, b. 310-333

p. 17, b. 334-359

p. 18, b. 360-379

p. 19, b. 380-399

p. 20, b. 400-419

p. 21, b. 420-443

p. 22, b. 444-468

FE - French edition

Main text

FE - French edition

FE1 - First French edition

FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy

GE - German edition

GE1 - First German edition

GE2 - Corrected impression of GE1

EE - English edition

EE1 - First English edition

EE2 - Corrected impression of EE2

EE3 - Revised impression of EE2

Select notes:

mark annotations

Category

Notation

Differences

No differences

FE - French edition

FE1 - First French edition

FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy

GE - German edition

GE1 - First German edition

GE2 - Corrected impression of GE1

EE - English edition

EE1 - First English edition

EE2 - Corrected impression of EE2

EE3 - Revised impression of EE2

Importance

Undo Clear

transcript

Issues : Terzverschreibung error [Delete]

Prezentacja

Select

copy link PDF FE - French edition

b. 99

c² in FE (→GE1,EE)

as¹w FEJ

b¹ in GE2

c² as the last semiquaver in FE (→GE1,EE) is most probably a mistake – cf. analogous bar 251. It is confirmed by the Chopinesque correction performed in pencil in FEJ. In turn, the reviser of GE2 removed the harmonic inconsistency with the L.H. part, yet he did not take into account the melodic structure of the figuration.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies, Errors in FE, Errors in EE, Errors in GE, Terzverschreibung error, Annotations in FEJ

notation: Pitch

Missing markers on sources: FE1, FEJ, GE1, GE2, EE1, EE2, EE3

Complete ➔

Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major