Issues : Inaccuracies in GE
b. 190
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||||
b. 213
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In GE, the mark is placed just after the 2nd crotchet in the bar. It is the engraver's inaccuracy. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||||
b. 214-215
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In GE, there are no dashes marking the range of diminuendo. It is most probably an arbitrary revision of the editor, since there are no dashes in the entire source. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||||
b. 222
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In GE, bar 222 opens a new great stave, resulting in an inaccurate slurring – a new slur begins on the 1st note, although the extended ending of the slur in the previous bar clearly points to its continuation. category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||||
b. 236
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The mark placed in FE could be interpreted as a hairpin, as in GE where it was even extended. However, in this context, it is most probably a long accent. The reviser of EE also recognized an accent in it, and reproduced it as a standard, short one. Similarly in bar 240. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE |