Issues : EE inaccuracies
b. 357-358
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In EE, the mark was placed a bar too early. It is difficult to determine whether it is a mistake of the engraver or an intended revision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , EE inaccuracies |
|||||||||||
b. 384-385
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In GE and EE, the earlier placement of the markings is unintentional, resulting from an inept layout of text. There is a similar situation in bars 392-393. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , EE inaccuracies |
|||||||||||
b. 387
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , EE inaccuracies |
|||||||||||
b. 400
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The lack of staccato dot in FE (→EE1) must be regarded as an inaccuracy. The mark was added already by the revisers of GE and EE2 (→EE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies |
|||||||||||
b. 430
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In all sources, the slurs are to be deemed inaccurate. According to us, it should encompass all small quavers of the passage and the main note to which it leads. It is compliant with the convention of writing down such ornaments. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |