b. 392-393
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
As in bars 384-385, the earlier placement of the markings in GE is unintentional, resulting from an inept layout of text. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||
b. 392
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In FE, the engraver (or Chopin himself in [A]) must have overlooked the staccato dot under the 3rd quaver. The mark, most probably after comparison with the next bar, was added by the revisers of EE and GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||
b. 392-393
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The slur in EE is an arbitrary addition, and possibly a mistake – repeating the slurring pattern from previous bars. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
b. 393
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
According to us, the short accent in FE (→GE,EE) is an inaccuracy of the engraver – cf. a much longer sign in similar bar 385. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||
b. 393
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |