![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : GE revisions
b. 133
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 135
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The version of FE (→GE1,EE) with a d1-b category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Annotations in FEJ |
||||||||
b. 139
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
Both GE and EE interpreted the mark of FE as an accent and gave it the form of a common short accent. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 148-149
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
According to us, the range of stretto was inaccurately conveyed by the engraver of FE (→EE) – it should last until ritenuto. An oversight of dashes is even more likely, since bar 149 opens a new line of text. Therefore, in the main text we suggest adding dashes accordingly. In GE, there are no dashes at all, which is a frequent inaccuracy of that edition. However, in this case, if our interpretation of Chopin's intention is correct, leaving stretto alone seems to be less misleading than marking its range inaccurately. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||
b. 163
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
We add a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |