Issues : Inaccuracies in GE
b. 77-78
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The differences in the range of the hairpin is probably a result of the engravers' inaccuracy. In the main text, we give a hairpin modelled after the mark in analogous bars 53-54. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||||
b. 83
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||||
b. 84
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The mark in FE paired with denotes a long accent in this context. A slight prolongation of the mark in GE made it clearly a hairpin. EE correctly considered the mark to be an accent and reproduced it as a standard, short accent. The same applies to bar 88. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||||
b. 88
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||||
b. 98-99
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In the main text, we reproduce the hairpin of FE, probably conveying Chopin's notation in [A] in the most faithful manner. Both GE and EE slightly shortened the mark, shifting its beginning under the first note in bar 99. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , EE inaccuracies |