![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : EE revisions
b. 367
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors repeated in GE |
||||||
b. 368
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The form of that adverb used in FE (→GE) is wrong. In EE, the reviser replaced it with the adjective leggiero. Cf. also the Concerto in F Minor, 3rd mvt., bar 81. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||
b. 368
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
||||||
b. 370
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In FE, the slur ends on the last note of bar 370, despite its continuation on the new line. It must be a mistake of the engraver. In EE and GE, the ending of the slur was extended – a revision we deem accurate – cf. analogous bars 230-231. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 377-378
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
Extending the range of the hairpin almost throughout the two bars is an arbitrary revision of EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |