mUltimate Chopin

Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : EE revisions

b. 367

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

In FE (→GE), there is no natural restoring d2. This patent oversight was corrected only in EE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors repeated in GE

b. 368

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

leggieremente in FE (→GE)

leggiero in EE

leggiermente suggested by the editors
..

The form of that adverb used in FE (→GE) is wrong. In EE, the reviser replaced it with the adjective leggiero. Cf. also the Concerto in F Minor, 3rd mvt., bar 81. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 368

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

No slur in FE (→GE,EE1)

Slur in EE2 (→EE3)
..

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions

b. 370

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

In FE, the slur ends on the last note of bar 370, despite its continuation on the new line. It must be a mistake of the engraver. In EE and GE, the ending of the slur was extended – a revision we deem accurate – cf. analogous bars 230-231.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions

b. 377-378

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Hairpin in FE (→GE)

Hairpin in EE
..

Extending the range of the hairpin almost throughout the two bars is an arbitrary revision of EE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions