mUltimate Chopin

Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : EE revisions

b. 341

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

A ​​​​​​​ is missing before the 3rd semiquaver in FE (→EE1). It was added in GE and EE2 (→EE3).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors repeated in EE

b. 344-346

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

In FE, the wavy lines next to the trill marks are short. We consider it to be an inaccuracy of notation – the need to trill throughout the entire value of the note seems to be obvious in this context – and extend the wavy lines in the main text accordingly. In GE and EE, the wavy lines are completely absent.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions

b. 344-346

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

3  in FE (→GE,EE)

3 long accents suggested by the editors
..

The  hairpins can only denote long accents in this context. Chopin's original markings may have been more or less extended in FE (→GE,EE).

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE

b. 352

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Semiquavers d2-b​​​​​​​1 in FE

Semiquavers f2-d2 in GE & EE
..

In the 2nd half of the bar in FE, the semiquaver beam combines the 2nd and 3rd notes instead of the 1st and 2nd ones. The in this context patent mistake was corrected already in GE and EE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions

b. 357-358

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

in bar 358 in FE (→GE)

in bar 357 in EE
..

In EE, the ​​​​​​​ mark was placed a bar too early. It is difficult to determine whether it is a mistake of the engraver or an intended revision.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , EE inaccuracies