mUltimate Chopin

Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : Inaccuracies in GE

b. 416-419

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

cresc. - - in FE

cre - scen - do in EE

No dashes in GE
..

The dashes marking the range of crescendo were omitted in GE, as in many other places in the Rondo. In EE, the indication – within the marked range – was divided into syllables what is a revision, typical of the English publisher.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE

b. 430

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Slur to e3 in FE

Slur from g1 to c3 in GE

Slur to c3 in EE

Slur suggested by the editors
..

In all sources, the slurs are to be deemed inaccurate. According to us, it should encompass all small quavers of the passage and the main note to which it leads. It is compliant with the convention of writing down such ornaments.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies

b. 436-438

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

 
 
..

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Hairpins denoting continuation

b. 443

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Long accent in FE

Short accent in GE & EE
..

In GE and EE, the accent was reproduced as short, a typical inaccuracy for this type of marks.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , EE inaccuracies

b. 447

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

No mark in FE (→GE,EE1)

in EE2 (→EE3)

[] suggested by the editors
..

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies