Issues : EE revisions
|
b. 305
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
FE (→EE1) has a c category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||
|
b. 309
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The missing staccato dot in FE (→EE) is probably an oversight of the engraver, hence we add it in the main text. The reviser of GE also added a dot. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
|||||
|
b. 318
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions; Source & stylistic information issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
|||||
|
b. 324
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In FE, a slur led only to the 3rd semiquaver is certainly inaccurate. This was amended by the revisers of GE and EE. There is a similar situation in bar 328. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 325-326
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The extended ending of the slur in FE in bar 325 – in that source it is the last bar on the page – suggests its continuation, unconfirmed, however, by the slurless first half of bar 326. The comparison with analogous bars 321-322 (as well as 329-330) proves that the slur should be continued to the 4th semiquaver of the next bar. The revisers of GE and EE deemed the end of slur in bar 325 inaccurate, and shortened it. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
1 in the chord at the end of the bar. It must be a mistake (false relation with the preceding note in the R.H., c2). The erroneous 
was removed in 
