mUltimate Chopin

Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : Inaccuracies in GE

b. 344-346

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

3  in FE (→GE,EE)

3 long accents suggested by the editors
..

The  hairpins can only denote long accents in this context. Chopin's original markings may have been more or less extended in FE (→GE,EE).

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE

b. 360-368

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

after 4th quaver in FE (→EE)

on 4th quaver in GE
..

In GE,  is under the 4th quaver. It is an inaccuracy resulting from an inept layout of text – the last quaver is placed next to the bar line. There is a similar situation in bar 364 and 368 although in the latter the inaccurate placing of the marking cannot be explained by the layout. See also bars 384-385.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions

b. 368

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Staccato dot in FE (→EE)
..

The lack of staccato dot for E is probably an oversight of the engraver of GE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE

b. 383

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

In GE, the engraver added a staccato dot for a​​​​​​​2. It is rather a result of inaccuracy than an intentional revision.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE

b. 384-385

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Staccato dots in FE (→EE)

No marks in GE
..

In GE, the engraver overlooked staccato dots for the 1st quavers in the L.H. in these bars.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE