![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Long accents
b. 31
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
The mark, which bears all characteristics of a long accent in FE, was interpreted in the remaining editions as a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 53-54
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
Three accents in b. 54 are slightly longer in FE, moved to the right and inclined, which, according to us, means that a different accent should be applied (with respect to the previous ones). Therefore, in the main text we reproduce them as long accents. The described difference was not considered significant in GE, whereas EE changed these accents to vertical ones. However, since it was also the last accent in b. 53 that was reproduced as vertical in EE, this change most probably was not related to the graphic representation of the accents in FE – arbitrary changes of accents to vertical ones are generally typical of EE – cf. b. 47-50. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||||||||
b. 111-112
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
We reproduce the four accents over the L.H. chords as long accents. According to us, they emphasise characteristic two-note motifs, used by Chopin on a number of occasions in other pieces. In the Etude in G category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Long accents |
|||||||||||
b. 119-120
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
Just like in b. 111, in the main text we give long accents in b. 119. We also add them in b. 120 after b. 112. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Long accents |
|||||||||||
b. 132
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
A long accent could have been added in the penultimate stage of proofreading of FE; it is indicated by the absence of the mark in EE along with the shift of dim. – see the previous note. In GE the mark was almost certainly erroneously interpreted as a category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , Authentic corrections of FE |