Issues : EE revisions
|
b. 70
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
According to us, the missing accent on the syncopated L.H. chord must be considered an inadvertence of the engraver of FE or of Chopin himself. This bar is a repetition of the preceding one, enhanced by the harmonic tension of the dissonant chord, which excludes a performance without accent. At the same time, both bars are the starting point for the structural stretto of the next two, in which crescendo is based on the accents derived from the syncopations of the discussed and preceding bars. The accent was already added in EE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 72
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
In the main text we suggest adding a category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , No pedal release mark |
||||||||
|
b. 73-74
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||||
|
b. 73-74
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 75-76
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
In FE (→GE) the slur started in b. 75, the last on the page, has no ending in b. 76. The inaccuracy was corrected in EE. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , Uncertain slur continuation , Errors repeated in GE |
in 
before b
2 in b. 73. The accidental was already added in 
