![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : GE revisions
b. 73-74
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Errors repeated in EE |
||||
b. 76
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
In FE the dyad of the bottom voice (e category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors |
||||
b. 78-79
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
The slurs combining the bass octaves at the transition between b. 78 and 79 are marked inaccurately in FE – in b. 78, which closes the page, there is only the slur that runs from d category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Uncertain slur continuation |
||||
b. 92
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
In FE (→EE,GE1) before the 8th note from the end of the bar, there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources |
||||
b. 93
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
According to us, a comparison with the next bar, in which d is tied, makes it highly likely that the tie in the discussed bar was accidentally overlooked. This is how it was evaluated in EE and GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |