![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Inaccuracies in FE
b. 171
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
Just like in b. 27, the missing category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 201
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
Like in b. 57, the way the L.H. and the R.H. are aligned almost certainly suggests a mistake, since it results in harmonic discrepancy. Therefore, in the main text we arrange the L.H. part in accordance with the rhythmic values of the first two R.H. notes. In addition, in the main text we suggest adding a L.H. slur after a similar figure from the preceding bar as well as in b. 17-18. The slur was also added in EE, running from the first out of two semiquavers. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||||||
b. 207
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
Just like in b. 63, of which the discussed bar is a literal repetition, the category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 217-218
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||||||||
b. 219
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
Just like in b. 75, the sources are lacking in the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE |