data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b. 238
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
In the main text we omit the unnecessarily repeated category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Cautionary accidentals |
|||||
b. 241-245
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
Just like in b. 225, FE are lacking in the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 241
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
There is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 241
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
Nothing points to a possible authenticity of the version of EE. It is probably a revision by analogy with b. 261 or a mistake, e.g. an unfinished correction of the e category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
|||||
b. 242
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
The version of GE is most probably a result of a revision, which, however, does not rule out the possibility that it could be compliant with Chopin's intention – see the note in b. 222. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Wedges |