![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : GE revisions
b. 54
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
In the main text we add an arpeggio before the L.H. chord, since in such a virtuoso texture, it is highly likely that this and the previous chord should be performed the same, even if the hand span allows for playing it simultaneously. The mark was also added in GE. The same in b. 198. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 57
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
In the main text we add a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Errors repeated in GE |
|||||
b. 62
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
In FE (→GE1,EE), there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||
b. 62
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
In FE (→GE1), there are no accidentals before the 1st, 3rd and 6th notes under the octave sign, which creates doubt as to their sound (at least theoretically). Corresponding accidentals – category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 63
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
According to us, it is likely that the category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |