In FE (→GE1,EE), there is no 
restoring e
3 on the 7th note of the run from the end. The patent mistake was corrected in GE2 (→GE3). The absence of a respective correction in EE is noteworthy, in which space for an accidental was left before this note. It is likely that the engraver forgot to insert the accidental intended by the reviser. The same in b. 206.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources
issues: Omissions to cancel alteration, GE revisions, Errors repeated in GE, Errors repeated in EE
notation: Pitch