Issues : Errors in GE
b. 94
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
The fact that the slur in GE starts later may be a mistake of the engraver or a revision, related to the addition of the tie of b. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 121
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
The missing staccato dot over a2 in GE may simply be an oversight; however, it cannot be ruled out that the mark was omitted on purpose as allegedly conflicting with the continuous slur over this note. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 132
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
In GE1 the minim is printed at the pitch of e1, however, the ledger line below the note is missing, as a result of which it looks like c1. Consequently, GE2 (→GE3) features here c1, which is a mistake. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||
b. 132
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
Due to graphic retouches of this fragment of the page, GE1a overlooked , which was also repeated in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||
b. 133
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
The missing staccato dot in GE is probably an oversight. An intentional omission of the mark, which could have been considered a mistake in the face of the absence of respective markings in the next, analogous bars, seems to be less likely. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |