mUltimate Chopin

Op. 22, Polonaise

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : Errors in EE

b. 87

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

..

In EE1 the quintuplet is written with semiquavers, which is a mistake, corrected then in EE2.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE

b. 88

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

Three-note chord in FE (→GE)

Four-note chord in EE
..

The version of EE is most probably erroneous – it could be, e.g. an unfinished correction of a Terzverschreibung, in which the correct note was added without removing the erroneous one. The additional note distorts the consistent and perfectly sounding sequence of the top three accompaniment voices.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in EE

b. 101

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

Accent in FE (→GE)

No mark in EE
..

The missing accent in EE is probably an oversight – see b. 102.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in EE

b. 102

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

R.H. accents in FE (→GE)

No marks in EE
..

Just like in the previous bar, the missing accents in EE are probably an oversight – the engraver forgot to add accents between the staves in the entire line.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in EE

b. 104-105

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

Slur in FE (→GE)

No slur in EE
..

The missing slur is probably an oversight of the engraver of EE, although one cannot rule out that the slur was added in the penultimate stage of proofreading of FE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in EE