Ornaments
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »
b. 125
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
Semiquavers instead of small quavers are an arbitrary revision of GE. This inauthentic version was also introduced in EE2, most probably on the basis of comparison with GE1. The same in b. 126. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 126
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
Just like in b. 125, the version of GE is an arbitrary decision of the engraver, repeated in EE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 142
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
The absence of a mordent both in EE and GE suggests that we are dealing with an oversight of the engraver of FE, which made its way to these editions; however, in FE it was corrected in the last stage of proofreading. In the main text we add an accidental – often omitted by Chopin in such situations – specifying the pitch of the mordent's top note. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 198
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
Just like in b. 54, of which the discussed bar is a literal repetition, in the main text we add an arpeggio mark before the L.H. chord. The mark was also added in GE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 199
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
category imprint: Differences between sources |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »