b. 101-102
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
Chopin indicated the position of the 1st finger in FED five times. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||
b. 101
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
|||||
b. 101
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
The slur of FE must be inaccurate, since there is no substantive reason for it not to encompass the entire passage. In turn, it is easy to misinterpret the beginning of the slur in this layout, if – which is highly likely – the beginning of the slur in [A] did not go beyond the top stave (cf., e.g. the autograph of the Etude in F Major, Op. 10 No. 8, b. 16, 29, 65 or the Concerto in F Minor, Op. 21, I mov., b. 235). Due to this reason, in the main text we include the extended slur of GE and EE. A similar inaccuracy, although less significant, can be suspected at the end of this slur. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 102
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
Just like in the previous bar, the missing accents in EE are probably an oversight – the engraver forgot to add accents between the staves in the entire line. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
|||||
b. 102-103
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
In the main text we lead the slur to the end of the passage due to the reasons discussed in the preceding bar. category imprint: Editorial revisions |