Issues : EE revisions

0
b. 216

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

No marking in FE (→GE1)

in EE & GE2 (→GE3)

[] suggested by the editors

..

Just like in b. 72, in the main text we suggest adding a  asterisk in accordance with the harmonic content. The mark was also added in EE and GE2 (→GE3).

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions

b. 217-218

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

..

In the main text we add a cautionary  before b2 in b. 73. The accidental was already added in GE as well as in EE2. In addition, we add the flats (overlooked in FE) lowering c1 to c1 in b. 73 and c to c in b. 74. The former was added both in GE and EE, whereas the latter only in GE and EE2.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Errors repeated in EE

b. 217-218

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

Vertical accents in EE

Horizontal accents in FE (→GE)

..

Arbitrary changes of accents to vertical ones are typical of EE – cf. b. 47-50

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 220

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

..

Just like in b. 76, the dyad of the bottom voice (e1-a1) in FE is a crotchet. The patent mistake was corrected both in GE and EE.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors

b. 221

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

risoluto in FE (→GE)

brillante in EE

..

It is difficult to explain how the risoluto indication was replaced in EE by brillante. It was probably an arbitrary decision of the publisher, although it could have also been the initial version, changed by Chopin in FE (→GE) in the last stage of proofreading.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE