![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : EE revisions
b. 155-156
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
The curved line of FE (→GE) placed on the side of the noteheads could be considered a tie of c1. This is how it was most probably understood in EE, where a slur was added over the chords. A comparison with the analogous situations in b. 152-153 and 153-154, in which the bottom-most, common note of the chords is not tied, shows that c1 is most probably to be repeated here. In order to avoid doubts, in the main text we place the slur over the chords. After all, it cannot be ruled out that the notation of [A] was unequivocal – the slur could have been placed over the chords (engravers would often move marks – slurs, accents, dots – to the side of the noteheads, not taking into account a possible change of significance of a given mark) or the second chord could have been provided with a staccato dot, like at the beginning of b. 155. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Placement of markings |
||||||
b. 155
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
The missing accent in FE (→GE) is probably an inaccuracy related to the transition to a new line. The mark was added in EE (as a short accent). In the main text we suggest a long accent, like in analogous motifs. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
||||||
b. 156
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
FE (→GE1) are lacking in the naturals before the a1 and a2 demisemiquavers. The latter was added in EE, whereas both – in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies |
||||||
b. 156-157
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
It is difficult to assume that Chopin could have imagined a different articulation for this pair of the L.H. octaves. It was already obvious to the revisers of both GE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 157
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
The only cautionary accidental in FE (→GE1→GE2) is the category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |