![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : GE revisions
b. 225
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
FE are lacking in the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 227
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
The abbreviation leg. used in FE is ambiguous – it may be explained as leggiero or legato. However, if Chopin had wanted to change the indication with respect to analogous b. 223, which features leggiero, he would have certainly used an unequivocal indication. Due to this reason, in the main text we give leggiero, which is also compliant with GE and EE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 230-234
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 241-245
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
Just like in b. 225, FE are lacking in the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 241
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
There is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |